GIS4930 - Module 2.2 - Interpolation

For this lab, we used three different interpolation methods: Thiessen, Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), and Spline, to map Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) across Tampa Bay, and compared how each method handles spatial variation and data distribution.

The easiest and most simple method was Thiessen interpolation, which assigns each location the value of its nearest sample point, which means the interpolated surface matches the exact values at the sample sites. This wasn't the best type of interpolation though as it creates abrupt transitions between the polygons which made it not as good at modeling the continuous environmental data like BOD.

Spline interpolation fits a curved surface that must pass directly through all of the input points. This created a smoothed, and honestly, very visually appealing interpolation, but seemed to be overestimating or underestimating values in areas with low data. This is what was happening in certain splots of the study area which is why it wasn't the best fit for the data either. 

Finally, Inverse Distance Weighted IDW estimates values by weighting nearby points more strongly than distant ones which creates a realistic surface and works well when data is evenly distributed and sampling density is high, which actually made it the best for this dataset.

 


IDW Interpolation

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

About Me

GIS4048 - Module 6 - Suitability Analysis (Part 2)