GIS4048 - Module 1 - Crime Analysis
For this lab, we explored 3 different techniques to map and analyze crime hotspots in Chicago using 2017 homicide data. The main objective was to assess how the three different spatial analysis methods: Grid Overlay, Kernel Density Estimation, and Local Moran’s I clustering can be used to highlight areas of high crime concentration and could even be an accurate measure to predict where homicides occurred in 2018.
Each technique approached the concept of a "hotspot" differently. The Grid Overlay method simply counted how many homicides occurred within evenly sized ½-mile grid cells across the city. After ranking the grid cells by homicide count, I selected the top 20% with the most homicides and dissolved them into a single hotspot zone. This technique provided a very targeted result, covering a small area with the highest density of crimes per square mile as compared to the other hotspot maps.
| Grid Overlay |
Next, we practiced using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) to create a smooth and continuous surface showing homicide intensity. This method doesn’t rely on boundaries but calculates density based on proximity between incidents. I used a cell size of 100 feet and a search radius of 2,630 feet, then classified only the highest density areas, being above three times the average as hotspots. The KDE technique provided a well balanced view of both concentrated and moderately intense areas (and in my opinion the most visually appealing).
| Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) |
Lastly, we used Local Moran’s I technique, which is a statistical clustering method that detects significant spatial clusters of high (or low) values. In this case, I calculated the homicide rate per 1,000 housing units by census tract and applied Local Moran’s I to find “high-high” clusters. These are tracts with high homicide rates surrounded by others with similarly high rates. These clusters were then dissolved into one hotspot area so they could be compared.
| Local Moran’s I |
After creating all three hotspot maps, we calculated their effectiveness by seeing how many 2018 homicides occurred within the 2017 hotspots. Local Moran’s I captured the most 2018 homicides (45%) but also had the largest footprint (35.38 mi²) and the lowest crime density. The Grid Overlay method was the smallest (15.45 mi²) and had the highest density, but only predicted 27% of 2018 homicides. KDE seemed to be the best middle ground, predicting 43% of 2018 incidents within 25.75 mi². This trade off between area and predictive power is important since, if we designated the entire city of Chicago as a hotspot, we’d “predict” 100% of future crimes, which wouldn’t be helpful for targeting resources like law enforcement. More advanced analysis would be needed to statistically compare the effectiveness of each method beyond just raw percentages and densities. I think this lab was a great introduction however to crime analysis techniques and has made me really interested in GIS forensics.
Comments
Post a Comment